أهلا وسهلا بك زائرنا الكريم، اذا كانت هذه زيارتك الأولى للمنتدى، فيرجى التكرم بالاطلاع على القوانين بالضغط هنا. كما يشرفنا أن تقوم بالتسجيل بالضغط هنا إذا رغبت بالمشاركة في المنتدى، أما إذا رغبت بقراءة المواضيع والإطلاع فتفضل بزيارة المواضيع التي ترغب.
موضوع: رد: F-22 vs Su-30/Su-35 Amazing performance in the air الأحد 4 نوفمبر 2012 - 16:49
واو مناورات رهيبة و الرابتور قوية في المناورات أيضا و لا تختلف عن عائلة الفلانكر في المناورات و قوتها لا تكمن فقط في خفائها
لمين الجزائري
عمـــيد
الـبلد : العمر : 41المهنة : لايهمالمزاج : اجتنبو تغيره فهو مستقرالتسجيل : 06/06/2012عدد المساهمات : 1896معدل النشاط : 1694التقييم : 77الدبـــابة : الطـــائرة : المروحية :
موضوع: رد: F-22 vs Su-30/Su-35 Amazing performance in the air الأحد 4 نوفمبر 2012 - 18:05
محب الكلاشنكوف كتب:
الصراحة انا افضل مقارنة السو-37 بالرابتور!!
سلام اخي محب لكلاشينكوف السو 35 هي تطوير للسو27 .. Before there was theory of 2 different SU-35s. One was a mid-life modernized SU-27 Flanker, but there’s also a much more re-engineered “SU-35” variant with canards, thrust vectoring, etc. which has been confused with (and possibly redesignated between) the SU-37. Revelations after 2007 began to provide answers. This article explains the sources of the widespread confusion regarding the SU-35’s layout and key characteristics, reviews what is now known about the platform, and tracks its development. Those developments are likely to have broad consequences. The aircraft has a home customer in the Russian Air Force, and the SU-35 is being positioned to succeed most SU-30MK variants as Russia’s fighter export of choice within the coming decade. ................................................. The SU-35S will also depend on its sensors. It couples an electronically-scanned array with a 2-step electro-hydraulic drive unit , which creates a maximum radar beam deflection angle of 120 degrees. The NIIP Tikhomirov Irbis-E passive phased-array radar radar can reportedly detect and tracks up to 30 air targets, simultaneously engaging up to 8. It can also reportedly detect, choose and track up to 4 ground targets and engage 2. Detection ranges of over 400 km/ 240 miles hav been reported for airborne targets, which are the easiest, but resolutions are unspecified. Detecting a 747 opassenger jet at 400 km is much easier than detecting a JAS-39 Gripen lightweight fighter, and information about its resolution would be needed before its real capabilities would be clear.
Full stealth jets like the F-22A Raptor, of course, create drastic reductions in radar detection range that make them a special case. In an emerging age of stealth fighters, the 80km+ detection range of the SU-35S’ IRST (infra-red search and track) system is very significant.