سبب سرعة البارجة الالمانية البسمارك


كانت ثورة في بناء السفن بعد دلك

مظبوط فالكون
تقييم

السوال
حاملة طائرات صعيرة للولايات المتحدة الامريكية
كانت ستحمل بطائرات اقلاع عامودي

المراد اسم السفينة ونوع الطائرات و السفن التي بنيت علي اساس الطراز

admiral elhabak كتب:

السوال
حاملة طائرات صعيرة للولايات المتحدة الامريكية
كانت ستحمل بطائرات اقلاع عامودي

المراد اسم السفينة ونوع الطائرات و السفن التي بنيت علي اساس الطراز

Sea Control Ship

Class overview General characteristics

Artist conception (1972)
Name:	Sea Control Ship (SCS)
Builders:	Never built
Operators:	United States Navy
Cost:	$100 million USD 1973 dollars (est.)
Planned:	8
Type:	ASW carrier
Displacement:	9,773 tons (light) 13,736 tons (full load)
Length:	620 ft (190 m)
Beam:	80 ft (24 m)
Draft:	21.62 ft (6.59 m)
Propulsion:	2 × General Electric LM2500+ gas turbines , one shaft, 45,000 shp 3 x 2500 Kw ship service generators (SSG)
Speed:	26 knots (48 km/h) 24 knots (44 km/h) (sustained)
Complement:	76 officers 624 enlisted
Armament:	2 x 20-mm Phalanx CIWS mounts
Aircraft carried:	3 x AV-8A Harrier VTOL 3 x SH-2 Seasprite LAMPS I 14 x SH-3 Sea King
Aviation facilities:	Flight deck: 545 x 105 ft. (166.1 x 32 m) Enclosed hangar: 19 ft. (5.8m) high Airraft elevators: 60,000 lb. (27.2 mt) lift capacity • Centerline: 60 x 30 ft. (18.3 x 9.1 m) • Stern: 35 x 50 ft. (10.7 x 15.4 m) JP-5 fuel capacity: 950 tons (861.8 mt) Aviation ordance: 180 tons (163 mt)

نوع الطائرات








النسخ الاخرى
. Spain's flagship , Principe de Asturias (R11), and her smaller cousin ship, Thailand's HTMS Chakri Naruebet , were based on the final US Navy blueprints for a dedicated sea control ship, but with the addition of a ski-jump ramp and follow a similar mission profile. As currently configured, the Italian aircraft carrier Giuseppe Garibaldi (551) would also fit under the SCS description. A STOVL flight deck equipped Spruance class destroyer
with Harriers for air cover was seriously considered in the 1970s for
the SCS but in the end rejected by the US Navy and Congress

تقييم يا حاج

اكبر فرقاطة في البحرية الامريكية علي مر التاريخ

مظبوط اخي بلاك رين

مشروع كان من المفترض ان ينفد علي البارجة يو اس اس كنتاكي

و لكن الغي

Kentucky was never completed, instead serving as a supply cache of sorts while in the mothball fleet at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard from about 1950 to 1958.[15] Hurricane Hazel hit the area on 15 October 1954; the storm caused Kentucky to break free from her moorings and run aground in the James River.[18] In 1956, Kentucky's bow was removed and used in the repair of Wisconsin, which had been damaged in a collision with Eaton on 6 May 1956.[15] Congressman William Huston Natcher attempted to block the sale of the ship by objecting to the bill in August 1957.[19] Nevertheless, Kentucky was struck from the Naval Vessel Register on 9 June 1958 and her incomplete hulk was sold for scrapping to Boston Metals Company of Baltimore, Maryland, on 31 October.[11][20] Boston Metals Company paid $1,176,666 for the vessel, and towed her to their shipyard in Baltimore in February 1959.[17]
When the first two of the Sacramento-class fast combat support ships, Sacramento and Camden, were laid down in 1961 and 1964, the Navy used Kentucky's four turbine sets to power the ships. This would later prove to be a beneficial decision: when the Navy switched from 600 psi (4.1 MPa) boilers to 1,200 psi (8.3 MPa) boilers, sailors who had served aboard Sacramento and Camden were posted to operate the older boilers aboard New Jersey during her combat tour in the Vietnam War and aboard all four of the Iowas when they were recalled and modernized in the 1980s as part of the 600-ship Navy plan.[15] A pair of 150-pound (68 kg) mahogany doors were donated by the state of Kentucky while the ship was still under construction; they were used in an o
هي دي الاجابة ؟

قربت منها

هو كان مشروع بس اتلغي و السفينة اتعانت في الميناء

كان لتحويل البارجة الى بارجة او طراد صواريخ موجة
عوض ان تكون مزودة بالمدافع فقط
تقرر اضافة صواريخ على متنها لكن اكتشفوا انه قد فات الاوان لذلك لانه اكثر من 73%
من البارجة قد بني و لم يكن هناك طريقة لتحويلها لذلك

^ This was not the first time that changes to the Iowa-class had been proposed: at the time the battleships were cleared for construction some policymakers were not sold on the US need for more battleships, and proposed turning the Iowa-class ships into aircraft carriers by retaining the hull design but switching their decks to carry and handle aircraft (This had already been done on the battlecruisers Lexington and Saratoga). This proposal was countered by Admiral Ernest King, the Chief of Naval Operations. "BB-61 Iowa-class Aviation Conversion". Retrieved 19 May 2007.
^ The addition of missiles to a battleship had already been done aboard the battleship Mississippi (BB-41/AG-128) to test the terrier missile after World War II. See DANFS Mississippi (BB-41). More recently, this was done to the four completed Iowa-class battleships to allow them to carry and launch BGM-109 Tomahawk missiles and RGM-84 Harpoon missiles. (United States General Accounting Office (20 April 1981). "Update of the Issues Concerning the Proposed Reactivation of the Iowa class battleships and the Aircraft Carrier Oriskany" (PDF). United States General Accounting Office. pp. 3–18. Retrieved 7 November 2007.)
[ed