eagle29
عريـــف أول
الـبلد : التسجيل : 28/03/2009 عدد المساهمات : 130 معدل النشاط : 137 التقييم : 10 الدبـــابة : الطـــائرة : المروحية :
| موضوع: رد: موضوع يستحق المناقشة منظومة الباتريوت الأحد 14 أبريل 2013 - 3:51 | | | - Anas Ali كتب:
- ^^
لو عندك مصدر تبقا خدمتنا وشكرا لاضافتك للموضوع
و الله يا اخوي ما اعرف ارفق مصدر بس ياريت يلي استشهد بتقرير الغارديان كمصدر للمعلومة ينزله للفائدة ... بس ممكن اعمل كوبي منه ينفع ؟؟؟ والشكر لك على ردك ... |
|
Anas Ali
لـــواء
الـبلد : العمر : 36 المزاج : متقلب التسجيل : 23/11/2012 عدد المساهمات : 2049 معدل النشاط : 3143 التقييم : 515 الدبـــابة : الطـــائرة : المروحية :
| موضوع: رد: موضوع يستحق المناقشة منظومة الباتريوت الأحد 14 أبريل 2013 - 10:02 | | | - eagle29 كتب:
- Anas Ali كتب:
- ^^
لو عندك مصدر تبقا خدمتنا وشكرا لاضافتك للموضوع
و الله يا اخوي ما اعرف ارفق مصدر بس ياريت يلي استشهد بتقرير الغارديان كمصدر للمعلومة ينزله للفائدة ... بس ممكن اعمل كوبي منه ينفع ؟؟؟ والشكر لك على ردك ... ينفع |
|
maxmum
عريـــف أول
الـبلد : التسجيل : 01/04/2013 عدد المساهمات : 140 معدل النشاط : 130 التقييم : 5 الدبـــابة : الطـــائرة : المروحية :
| موضوع: رد: موضوع يستحق المناقشة منظومة الباتريوت الأحد 14 أبريل 2013 - 10:50 | | | - نسر المغرب العربي كتب:
- اقتباس :
وايضا تم اسقاط صاروخ كروز توماهوك امريكي اطلق بالخطأ باتجاه الكويت
المعروف عن خواص الباتريوت باك1-2 انه يشتبك مع الاهداف ابتداءا من ارتفاع 60 مترا كم كان ارتفاع الكروز لما اشتبك معه الباتريوت ؟
وبالنسبة للضغوط طبعا تركيا عضو في حلف شمال الاطلسي لذلك هي ليست حرة في مصادر تسليحها ورغما عنها الباتريوت بدل الاس-300 اخي نسر هنا اضاف نقطه هامه وان هناك ضغوط تمارس علي دول النيتو اي ان اي دوله بداخل الحلف تكون مجبره علي اختيارات محدده فأذا كانت هناك حريه كنا سنري منظومات الدفاع الروسيه فى جميع انحاء الحلف وهذا من وجهه نظري الضعيفه |
|
eagle29
عريـــف أول
الـبلد : التسجيل : 28/03/2009 عدد المساهمات : 130 معدل النشاط : 137 التقييم : 10 الدبـــابة : الطـــائرة : المروحية :
| موضوع: رد: موضوع يستحق المناقشة منظومة الباتريوت الخميس 18 أبريل 2013 - 4:27 | | | - Anas Ali كتب:
- eagle29 كتب:
و الله يا اخوي ما اعرف ارفق مصدر بس ياريت يلي استشهد بتقرير الغارديان كمصدر للمعلومة ينزله للفائدة ... بس ممكن اعمل كوبي منه ينفع ؟؟؟ والشكر لك على ردك ... ينفع Caution over Scud attack claimsKuwait says attacks from Iraq used banned missiles claimed to have been destroyed Four Iraqi missiles were fired into Kuwait yesterday near points where US and British troops were massing for invasion. <p>Two were widely reported to be Scuds. But the British government was cautious last night, saying it was awaiting confirmation. <p>There were no casualties and no suggestion that chemical or biological warheads were loaded on to the missiles. <p>British Harrier jets were scrambled to bomb the mobile Iraqi missile launchers based around Basra in southern Iraq. <p>A Kuwaiti defence ministry spokesman said that two Scuds had been fired. If only one turned out to be a Scud, it would be proof that Saddam Hussein had been lying not only over the last few months but the last 12 years. <p>Iraq claimed that had it destroyed all its Scud missiles after the last Gulf war but the US and Britain have maintained that 15 to 20 had been hidden. <p>A British government official said: "If it really was a Scud, it is prohibited by 687 [the 1991 United Nations ceasefire resolution], and Iraq has repeatedly denied possession of them, and we were right all along." <p>The Iraqi information minister, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, denied Iraq had fired any Scuds or had any. <p>One of the alleged Scuds was reported to have been brought down by a US Patriot missile. Scud missiles are much bigger than others in Iraq's arsenal and should have been easily identifiable. But if it has been hit by a Patriot, it may prove difficult to find any recognisable parts. <p>An RAF spokesman, Group Captain John Fynes, who is based in northern Kuwait, said that the role of the Harriers was "to hunt down all threats to the coalition and if they find them they will destroy them". Some of the Harriers were sent up to wait for any further attacks against US and British forces in Kuwait. <p>Two of the missiles were Chinese-built Seersucker anti-ship missiles, which are much smaller than Scuds and fly low to the ground. It is thought the Seersuckers were positioned south of Basra and originally intended to attack US and British warships. <p>At Camp New Jersey - one of at least two encampments in the Kuwaiti desert where soldiers jumped into protective gear - military sources said the missile might have been a Samoud 2. <p>Iraq is allowed missiles with a range of up to 150km (93 miles) but Scuds have a range well beyond that, which is why they were banned. <p>Iraqi forces had been close to the border on Wednesday night, hours before the US deadline for war ran out. But a British defence source in Qatar said the artillery appeared to have retreated to the city of Basra yesterday. <p>The missile attacks were not regarded as an overly serious threat to the safety of the British and US troops, although chemical gas warnings were sounded and soldiers were ordered to wear their gas masks and chemical and biological weapon protection suits. <p>By early evening, about a dozen missile attacks were reported, including eight missiles that buzzed above a CNN reporter accompanying US-led troops in Kuwait. <p>One missile landed near the US army's A Company, 3rd Battalion, 7th Infantry Regiment, whose soldiers were eating lunch. "That is not supposed to be happening," said Captain Chris Carter, the company commander. <p>Within minutes a message came across the radio: a tactical ballistic missile had hit the desert. Minutes later, all troops were ordered to put on gas masks and biochemical protective suits. هذا هو نسخة مطبوعة عن الخبر و مع الاسف لا ما اعرف شلون ارفق المصدر ... |
|